+18
This site publishes sports picks and betting-related content. Only adults may use it.
Gamble responsibly. If you need help: 900 200 225 · responsible gambling
We store your answer in your browser so we don't ask again.
What to check before paying anyone, with concrete numbers.
Choosing a tipster is hard for an uncomfortable reason: good numbers are easy to manufacture. Deleting losers, writing down better odds than were available, posting a pick after kick-off or showing only the best month cost nothing and cannot be spotted from outside. So the question is not whether the figures are good, but whether they are checkable.
Below 100 settled bets any figure is noise: ten winners in a row move the whole yield. From 500 it starts to say something real. A 30 % yield over 40 bets is not talent, it is a streak.
Hit rate does not tell you whether you make money. You can hit 70 % at 1.20 and lose, or 35 % at 4.00 and win a lot. A sustained 3 % to 8 % over a large sample is already very good; 30 % or 50 % means a tiny sample or numbers that are not real.
Drawdown is the worst fall their bankroll has taken from a peak. It matters because you will not be joining on day one: two tipsters with the same yield may have had falls of 3 and 40 units, and joining just before a 40 means living that loss in full.
CLV measures whether they took a better price than the market before kick-off. It is the only metric that separates skill from luck without waiting for hundreds of bets. The combination to fear is positive yield with negative CLV: they are making money betting at worse prices than the market, which is luck — and luck runs out right after you subscribe.
Stake €10 a pick across 30 picks a month and you move €300. At a 5 % yield — already very good — you make €15. A €50 subscription leaves you losing money even if the tipster is excellent.
Check four things: that they show the full record including losses, that they have at least several hundred bets, that picks are published before the match with the odds, and that the figures are verified by somebody other than them. Fail any of the four and you are not buying information, you are buying blind trust.
Below 100 settled bets the figures are noise: one good run moves them entirely. From 500 they start to say something about judgement. A 30 % yield over 40 bets is not talent on display, it is a hot streak.
A sustained 3 % to 8 % over a large sample is already very good. Anyone boasting 30 % or 50 % either has very few bets or the numbers are not real. A huge yield held over time simply does not exist in this market.
No — yield wins. Hit rate does not tell you whether you make money: you can hit 70 % at odds of 1.20 and lose, or 35 % at 4.00 and win a lot. Anyone showing off their hit rate rather than their yield is picking the figure that flatters them.
It is the worst fall their bankroll has taken from a peak. It matters because you will not be joining on day one: if they had a 40-unit fall and you join just before a similar one, you live that whole loss even if their overall record is good.
Only if the price is small next to what you stake and the figures are verified. Paying €50 a month while betting €10 a pick is mathematically absurd: the subscription eats any realistic edge. Do the maths first.