Is your Telegram tipster real?
Paste the results history the channel brags about and we run it through two mathematical tests. Everything is computed in your browser: nothing is sent or stored, and we never ask for the channel's name — we analyze numbers, not people.
Paste the history (one line per pick, with its odds and whether it won or lost) and the analysis appears by itself.
Want to check your own numbers? Try the profitability calculator →
How to spot a tipster inflating their record
How do I know if a Telegram tipster is trustworthy?
Ask for the full record, not screenshots of the wins. A believable record includes the losses, states the odds of every pick and is published BEFORE the match. If you only ever see winning messages and never losing ones, you are not looking at a record: you are looking at a selection.
What are the signs of an inflated record?
A very high hit rate at long odds sustained over time, which is mathematically improbable; edited or deleted messages; picks posted after kick-off; and odds nobody else was offering at that moment. None is proof on its own, but together they speak.
Can you mathematically prove a record is fake?
Prove, no; measure how plausible it is, yes. If someone claims a hit rate at given average odds, you can work out the probability of that result happening by chance. When that probability is minuscule the record is implausible — not the same as impossible, but worth knowing before paying.
Why are screenshots not enough?
Because a screenshot can be cropped, edited or reused, and because showing only what went well costs nothing. The only thing that counts is a record that cannot be altered after publication: odds sealed at the moment and a log nobody can touch.